Sabah Forest Industries Sdn Bhd V Industrial Court Malaysia Anor

Sabah commercial banks.

Sabah forest industries sdn bhd v industrial court malaysia anor. ó harris solid state m sdn. Alimah md som lwn. Industrial court of malaysia and anor. S 01 1m 359 10 2013 2014 4 ilr 258.

Bruno gentil pereira anor 1996 4. Industrial court malaysia anor civil appeal no. Heng kuang yuan lwn. Sabah forest industries sdn bhd v.

Suresh kumar sundram v. In the sabah forest industries case the court of appeal held inter alia that compensation in lieu of reinstatement cannot be ordered if at the date of the award the claimant has passed his compulsory retirement age. Unhappy with the interpretation attained the matter was taken up in judicial review before the high court. Sabah forest industries sdn bhd v.

Industrial court malaysia anor civil appeal no. 10 18 4 456 11 2014 4 ilr 275. S 01 227 2011 2013 2 ilr 1. The decision is immune from examination even by the industrial court.

9 4 893 10 2014 4 ilr 266. In the court of appeal s case of sabah forest industries sdn bhd v industrial court malaysia anor 2 mlj 410 procedural impropriety became a ground for judicial review when the industrial court or public decision maker failed to observe the principles of natural justice on top of failing to observe procedural rules that are expressly laid down in the statute from which it derives its jurisdiction or authority to decide. Interworld network m sdn bhd no. Case of sabah banking employees uni on v.

National union of hotel. Jrks j 76 2012 2013 2 ilr 17. The discussion is based on the recent federal court decision in unilever m holdings sdn bhd v. However the industrial court is empowered or even duty bound to investigate the facts and circumstances of a particular case to determine whether that exercise of power was in fact bona fide.

In r ramachandran v. Industrial court malaysia anor. V industrial court malaysia anor 2014 to further substantiate his view. In sabah forest industries sdn bhd v industrial court malaysia anor 5the court of appeal held inter alia that compensation in lieuof reinstatement does not arise in cases where the employee has passed his compulsory retirement age which is currently set at the age of 60 pursuant to section 4 of the minimum retirement age act 2012.

He provided what was a seemingly compelling argument making reference to a previous practice direction and the case of sabah forest industries sdn. Sabah forest industries sdn bhd sfi today announced a temporary layoff programme involving its 1 350 employees.